Security + AI Due Diligence
Security, data, AI, architecture and continuity risks before signing, investing, buying or integrating.
View service
Cyber and AI risk
Cyber and AI risk, reviewed with clear scope.
Kronixial helps B2B teams review technical risk before signing, selling to enterprise customers, deploying AI or automating processes with internal data. Focused work, sufficient evidence and practical next steps.
Defined scope
Reviewed evidence
30/60/90 actions
No open-ended work
KX-01
Situation to review
KX-02
Available evidence
KX-03
Relevant risks
KX-04
Next steps
Clear scope
Clear reporting, without overstating the risk.
2-10 daysTypical duration for short reviews.
30/60/90Prioritized actions for the next few weeks.
Plain languageRisk explained without false certainty.
Senior reviewExperienced technical review with clear scope.
When we step in
When a technical decision or critical process needs clearer context.
Kronixial steps in when a decision around security, vendors, AI, compliance, automation or incidents needs careful review.
01
Enterprise security review
A large customer asks for evidence, controls, policies, questionnaires, SOC 2, ISO or AI posture.
02
Vendor / M&A risk
You are about to sign, buy, invest or integrate technology and need to understand material risks before committing.
03
AI connected to data
Your team uses LLMs, RAG, agents or copilots with documents, CRM, tickets, records or internal data.
04
Compliance readiness
You need to organize evidence, responsible teams, minimum policies and gaps before audit or procurement.
05
Incident readiness
Leadership needs to know who decides, what gets shut down, what gets communicated and what evidence is preserved.
06
Manual processes with data
Reports, evidence, tickets, approvals or integrations consume time and need a controlled workflow.
Services
View all services
Concrete services for reviewing risk before committing time, money or data.
AI / LLM / RAG Risk Review
Review of data, permissions, tools, logging, retention and minimum controls.
View serviceAI, Automation & Data Implementation
Implementation of concrete AI, integration or data workflows after defining process, permissions and acceptance criteria.
View serviceSOC 2 / ISO Readiness
Scope, evidence tracker, control matrix, gaps, responsible teams and work plan.
View serviceIncident Readiness + Tabletop
Response plan, RACI, playbooks, simulation, after-action report and backlog.
View serviceRapid Risk Triage
Short review to organize an uncertain situation and decide what to review first.
View serviceFractional Security Lead
Ongoing guidance after an initial review, with defined hours and responsibilities.
View serviceMethod
Scope, evidence, review and closeout.
Each review starts with a concrete question and ends with findings, limits and prioritized actions.
01
Fit and scope
We validate decision, deadline, assets, exclusions, point of contact and authorization.
02
Evidence intake
We request documents, diagrams, limited access, policies, logs, questionnaires or AI flows.
03
Review and interviews
We separate aspirational documentation from operational reality through technical review and interviews.
04
Closeout
We present material risks, severity, evidence, confidence levels and executive recommendations.
05
30/60/90 plan
We close with priorities, responsible teams, initial actions, residual risk and next steps.
How we work
Clear scope. Sufficient evidence. Practical recommendations.
The work ends with findings, limits and next steps. If implementation follows, it is defined as a separate phase with acceptance criteria.
Working criteria
- Scope is defined before access is requested.
- Important findings include evidence or an explicit limitation.
- Risk is explained without overstating it.
- Implementations require a process, owner, data and closure criteria.
- The report separates reviewed items, open items and out-of-scope items.
Contact
Start a conversation
What do you need reviewed?
Share the context, deadline and what you already have. If it makes sense, we define a focused review.