Evidence-backed findings and a 30/60/90 plan in 2–10 days. No FUD. No endless projects.
Buy clarity and speed: defined deliverables, clear exclusions, and a 30/60/90 path.
Find red flags and critical risks for fast decisions (buy-side, vendor onboarding, enterprise deals).
Bring order to scope, controls, evidence, and narrative for auditors/certifiers (readiness, not certification).
Operate a defensible security program without hiring a full-time CISO.
Prepare roles, playbooks, and practice to reduce incident impact.
Standard cadence to deliver fast and reduce risk: kickoff → evidence → midpoint → readout.
Align objectives, deliverables, exclusions. No open-ended promises.
60-min kickoff and a clear Information Request List.
Doc review + guided interviews + targeted verification (if applicable).
Early findings to course-correct in time.
Exec report + technical appendix + Q&A + 30/60/90 plan.
Two-week check: progress, questions, next step.
Examples of deliverable formats (anonymized). The goal: executive-ready decisions and a defensible narrative.
What a CEO/VP needs: decision, impact, and next steps.
| Area | Finding | Severity | Confidence | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAM | Incomplete MFA on privileged accounts | Critical | High | Enforce MFA + review admin roles (48–72h) |
| Logging | Insufficient retention and limited alerting | High | Medium | Define baseline + enable key signals (1–2 weeks) |
| LLM | Data leakage risk via prompts and tools | Medium | Medium | Redaction + policy + tool-call logging (2–4 weeks) |
| IR | Missing playbooks for ATO and breach | High | High | Tabletop + after-action + 30/60/90 backlog |
Simple sheet: control → owner → evidence → frequency → status. Auditor-ready.
Clear roles, severity levels, escalation, and calm comms.
Impact‑prioritized initiatives with owners and target dates.
If you need a vendor security questionnaire answer, here’s the short version.
Minimal brand, clear process, strong deliverables. No noisy marketing.
Direct answers to avoid misunderstandings and scope creep.
Not by default. We focus on evidence-based assessments and readiness. If you need deep exploitation, we scope it as a separate project or coordinate with a dedicated pentest firm.
No. We do readiness so you approach auditors/certifiers with scope, controls, evidence, and narrative.
We can offer an IR retainer with explicit SLAs. We avoid promising unlimited 24/7 without a formal agreement.
Yes: we review common risks (data leakage, prompt injection, tool abuse, access controls, logging) and leave defensible controls.
NDA + SOW + deposit. Then kickoff and access to evidence defined in the IRL.
Yes. Low public exposure, strong deliverables. Legal identification still applies for contracts and invoicing.
Tell us your goal (SOC 2, enterprise deals, vendor onboarding, incident, AI) and we’ll recommend the right sprint.
Email us 3 bullets: context, urgency, and what decision you need.
Demo: this form does not send yet. Connect it to Formspree or your own endpoint (API Gateway/Lambda).